“Have you been here before?” the clerk asked.

For a moment I was frozen in time. I stared blankly back at him. While my eyes fell upon his face, my mind’s eye carried through him and morphed into a target-less gaze.

He was in his 50s and the vantage of my height over his allowed me to see thinning hair in all of the usual places. He wore a tie that nearly matched his earthen brown shirt, with both tie and shirt following the contour etched by his protruding belly.

“Had I been here before?”

“Had I been here before?” I again asked myself faintly, cryptically, as if my mind were whispering to itself – afraid that others might perceive the question. I felt embarrassed I didn’t know. Here I was at yet another hotel. Another hotel, in a long string of hotels. But not the end of a long string of hotels, for there would be many more hotels to come. This was a blip, a single dot, in a sea of unending dots that carried off in both directions of time.

His question certainly referred to geography, the physical space which he and I both occupied at that moment, though his chosen attire, the pinewood countertop and empty wooden mail slots behind him left open the suggestion that he might have been vaguely alluding to time.

I had no idea where I was or if I had been there before. Thirty minutes prior to this question, I had touched down at San Diego airport. I was met by a driver, black suit, well-groomed hair, grey goatee. He was fit, with an easy demeanor. A surfer, I thought, who drives at night to cover bills without encroaching on his ultimate passion. He led me to his black town car parked outside. I followed him mechanically, unconsciously, but trustworthily. As we began to pull away, I instinctively asked him how far we had to go, but before he could answer that first of questions, I asked sheepishly where in fact we were going and admitted, even more under my breath that I didn’t actually know where I was going.

So here I stood in front of the desk clerk. After regaining myself in both time and geography mumbled, “I don’t know.” I looked around but nothing suggested a familiarity. I had no idea if I had been there before. I was strangely ok with this, but felt a subtle unease, unsure if I was uneasy about not knowing or being strangely ok with not knowing.

I left the front desk, weaved through the main building, onto a covered walk outside, made my way across the property as I cut through the dark, quiet night. Eventually I stumbled into my hotel room, the window blinds offering a familiarity that I had in fact been there before. “Surely I’ve been here,” I thought to myself. “have I not been at most of the resorts along this stretch of coast?” I considered. “how could I have not been here before,” I wondered.

Perhaps the morning will offer new details.

 

 

I’m in the process of hiring a life/executive coach to work with over the next year. I’ve been interviewing coaches over the last few weeks to ascertain fit, approach and style. One of the coaches I interviewed last week made a fascinating (to me) observation as we chatted: I talk to think while others think to talk. Apparently this is a thing, but it hasn’t been a thing I’ve reflected on. It hasn’t really been a thing I’ve even noticed. But since our conversation last week, I’ve noticed it in everyone I’ve interacted with. It’s like the great over-under toilet paper orientation debate, everyone seems to have their way and its one of two alternatives – some talk to think while others think to talk. This insight has allowed me to understand others more fully and consequently helps me to give them greater space based upon their preferred approach. I find myself writing memo-like emails to those who think to talk and setting up quick conversations with those, like myself, who tend to talk to think. Brainstorming meetings  and working meetings seem to be well structured for those who talk to think so I’m trying to take notice of those who think to talk and pull them into the conversation in ways that are comfortable and natural for them. Do you think to talk or do you talk to think?

Last Thursday would have been my 15th wedding anniversary (15 years!!!). I love seeing others acknowledge and celebrate their anniversaries on Facebook and share photos from that special day (we were all babies!!!). I find myself especially enjoying those who make it past year 14. Lucky 13 was as far as A_____ and I made it. I didn’t get it right. But in the same breath that I acknowledge my failings, I recognize the things I’ve learned in the time and space that has passed since the dissolution of our marriage. Here are six things my divorce taught me, or perhaps more accurately, what I’ve learned since my divorce. These are some of the things I take into future relationships:

  1. We look at love languages inside out. We often (read: always) seem to approach love languages from a perspective of receiving. But rarely, do we approach them from a perspective of accepting. We talk of love languages in terms of “I.” What I need. How I receive. How I give. I think this is a faulty (and potentially fatal) approach. Rather than talking about me and my love languages, I think it can be a more productive approach to turn things on their head. Recognize the ways in which your spouse is conveying love to you and simply accept it. Too often we focus on not feeling loved, and all of the myriad ways in which we don’t feel loved, rather than looking at all of the things our spouse is doing in an effort to show us love. Rather than being bogged down by all of the ways I didn’t feel loved, I should have accepted unconditionally that everything she did was because she loved me, regardless if that was true or not. We can give love by accepting love the way it is given.
  2. Accept that you are loved. Related to point #1, one of the things I think I’ve come to realize is that A_____ and I never truly accepted that we were loved unconditionally by the other. I think we felt we had to “earn” the other’s love or at least be “worthy” of the other’s love. We never accepted that we were simply loved by the other. Love was always some reward. It was always dependent on something we did for the other. That logic is faulty. My love for her certainly wasn’t dependent on anything she did or didn’t do. There would have been incredible strength in our relationship had I simply accepted being loved unconditionally no matter what she did or how I felt. And accepting that I was loved unconditionally would have been just one way for me to give to the relationship. Accept that your spouse loves you unconditionally and if you feel you can’t say that, talk to your spouse about it. Appreciate what you have and how it is given.
  3. It really is that simple. As I talk to my (still) married friends, I often hear the stresses, strains, and frustrations of their marriage. I suggest to them (and to you right now), to drop whatever you are doing and give your significant other a GIANT hug, a HUGE kiss, and tell them repeatedly how much you appreciate them. It is vulnerable. It can place us in a position where we can feel rejected and hurt. I often hear, “it isn’t that simple.” But I really think it is that simple and a clear and simple bid will go a long way. From the outside, the weight you lob on yourself could be significantly diminished if we just showed a little vulnerability – some unconditional love and some heartfelt appreciation.
  4. You are best friends and partners, not coaches, head masters, or wardens. For whatever reason, we too often feel compelled to “teach” our significant others. This (probably) comes from a place of love. But it almost always looks like control and criticism. A_____ and I always had ways the other could improve. Things the other could do differently. It’s not surprising. You often know your spouse better than they know themselves. Accept they are doing their best. Be at peace with everything. Too frequently we allow ourselves to be annoyed by things that simply don’t matter. The most powerful thing about agency is not controlling what you do, it is controlling how you feel. We so frequently feel compelled to “correct” or “improve” others when we’d probably be best served by developing greater control of our feelings.
  5. Recognize (and accept hurt). One of the things that hindered our marriage was that both of us were really hurt and we didn’t see it or accept it. That is true not only for the other’s hurt, but for our own. We get so busy, we lose sight that the person on the other side of the family operation is a person too. Our souls are incredibly tender. We get hurt and we retreat. We center on self and lose sight of those whom we love most dearly. We need to recognize when we’ve hurt the other person and work towards forgiveness. We need to give them time and space to heal. We equally need to recognize when we are hurt and ask for the time and space to heal. We need to forgive our spouse more quickly and more freely. We need to also do the same for ourselves – forgiving ourselves quickly and freely. There is an ancient
  6. It is always worth fighting for. This is true until there isn’t something worth fighting for I suppose. At some point some separation has to take place so you can recenter and grow again. I think Laura Pritchett captured this well in her recent NYT’s article (No Sound, No Fury, No Marriage). I still have strong convictions that marriage is worth fighting for and it can be fought for. A_____ and I didn’t let the long view dictate enough of our marriage. I write this delicately because its my philosophical believe about marriage right now as opposed to a tangible believe specific to the marriage that A_____ and I had. I’m incredibly grateful to be where I’m at – to have learned what I’ve learned and experienced what I’ve experienced through (and since) our divorce. I don’t feel those two emotions need be mutually exclusive. We didn’t have a healthy relationship on many levels and that’s what we should have been fighting for the entire time.

I had lunch today with one of my favorite people. We talked about life and family, work and travel, traditions, vacations, and painting furniture. All of the things I love! The sun was shining (a rarity in DC these days) and the conversation flowed as natural as it always has between us. There is something special about sharing a worldview with similarities and commonalities while at the same time always having learned new things about myself and how I want to live the rest of your life by the time the conversation closes.

The topic turned to moving. As her young family continues to grow, she and her husband are exploring where to move their nest now that their nest needs a little more room. She asked me how I liked where I lived which was almost immediately followed with, “but how’s the commute?” Every place has its pros and cons and one of the biggest on the list in the DMV (and many places I go) is traffic.

After talking about traffic, “normal commutes,” abnormal commutes, and departure times, it occurred to me that technology has the potential to fundamentally alter this conversation. My daily commute is defined by Waze. Not all have the same experience I do, but I have found it reliably accurate and have turned my commute over to Waze. When Waze tells me to turn left, I do it. If Waze tells me to stay straight, I do it.

While talking about our commutes I pulled out Waze and had the platform route me home – 17 miles, 25 minutes. My friend did the same. At that moment she was 25 minutes from home. While we live in very different areas, she much “closer” to the office than I, our commutes at that moment were exactly the same. It didn’t matter to either of us the routes we took or the miles we covered. It only mattered how long from point A to B.

Obviously checking right after lunch wouldn’t give you a realistic look at an average commute happening in the morning or evening hours. I suggested she check as she normally leaves work or home and compare what Waze gives her for my address with what Waze gives her for her commute. That will give her a more realistic view of what her commute might look like on an on-going basis. The difference between her current commute and a perspective commute is a “commuting cost.” Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Only you can decide that.

Digitized information is increasingly before us. The next step is driving services from these data.  Already Waze is beginning to share information with cities to improve the accuracy of the platform and in turn improve the intelligence of city planners, officials, and residences.

Imagine a partnership between Waze and someone like Redfin or Zillow. Combined you might be able to compare average commutes on any given day or across different weeks. Houses could have “commuting cost” indexes. Not generic estimates, but precise estimates for a specific work address. Commute time information already existed; it just wasn’t being systematically aggregated. It wasn’t digitally available. As information like this becomes digitally, we will start making data dominated decisions.

As we prepare for the 50th anniversary of CES in 2017, we close the door on the second annual CES Asia, held last week in Shanghai. For those of you who attended both last week and the inaugural event last year, you saw the stark differences in these two events with your own eyes. Despite only being in its second year, CES ASIA has grown tremendously – and in all the right ways.

CES Asia is Asia’ premier event for consumer tech. More than 375 companies from 23 countries, regions and territories  exhibited across 32,000 gross square meters of exhibit space. Notable exhibitors included 3M, Audio-Technica, Baidu, Beltronics, BMW, China Mobile, Cobra Electronics, Garmin, Hisense, IBM, LeTV, Mercedes-Benz, Monster, Pioneer, Speck, Twitter, Voxx and many more. This year, CES Asia introduced Startup Park, featuring 64 startups from around the world.

More than 32,000 attendees walked through the doors, including more than 1,000 members of the media. Across 50+ conference sessions and keynotes, big names like BMW Group Greater China President and CEO Olaf Kastner, Alibaba President of Tmall Consumer Electronics and Home Appliances Yin Jing and Huawei Present Kevin Ho delivered big ideas as virtual reality, the Internet of Things and connected cars took center stage.

Here are seven key takeaways from CES Asia 2016:

  1. CES ASIA has matured in just two years. This was evident not only by the strength of multi-national exhibitors but also by the investments in high-quality exhibit booths. For example, there were a large number of two-story exhibit booths. The quality of the show is extremely high.
  1. The ecosystem is united in painting a full picture of a technologically-infused future. CES Asia is an unparalleled experience in Asia. Most Asian tradeshows I have attended are heavily focused supplier/buyer affairs where attendees are concentrated on securing new products or sourcing services. CES Asia is decidedly different. Entire ecosystems are coming together at. For example, not only were leading auto manufacturers like BWM, Mercedes-Benz, Chevy, and Volvo exhibiting, but also leading suppliers further upstream like Continental, Valeo and TE Connectivity. This is the only show I’ve seen in Asia that highlights the innovation happening in an area holistically, from start to finish. This will also position CES Asia, like CES, as an event where business gets done and industry deals are brokered, because the entire ecosystem is present. It’s worth noting that CES Asia is also shaping up to be a very different show than even CES. More than half – 57 percent – of CES Asia exhibitors did not exhibit at CES 2016 in Las Vegas.
  1. Innovation transcends national boundaries. CES Asia attracted companies from around the globe. More than one-third of participating companies are headquartered outside mainland China. It was awesome to see the wide mix of multinational corporations exhibiting side by side. The best and brightest converged on CES Asia to highlight the innovative products and services they are bringing to market.
  2. Companies are competing both globally and locally. Never before has the marketplace for consumer technology been so global. And as a result, never before has the local marketplace been so fierce. Companies need to have a product or service that can stand against the most meaningful products and services in the world. They also need products and services that cater to local needs and preferences. CES Asia is a global stage with a local focus. It’s global in its reach but local in its application. Because most business happens at a decidedly local level, global companies are able to use CES Asia to highlight their understanding of these local needs. That makes CES Asia both unique and relevant. For example, JD.com showcased its delivery drones. Deploying drones for well-defined purposes is a trend I see emerging as I travel the globe. JD.com highlighted how this approach can be customized for the unique needs and attributes of the marketplace in Asia.
  1. Brands matters. CES ASIA has become a gathering place for global brands competing for awareness in Asia. Most of the companies exhibiting at CES Asia are global brands, known throughout Asia, that have a strong understanding of the unique needs of the regional marketplace. International exhibitors are looking to strengthen their brand positions further. There was an extremely strong focus on brand.
  2. The place to see the evolving nature of online services and retailing in Asia. CES Asia featured all four of China’s top retailers: Suning, Yihaodian, Alibaba and JD.com. No other event in the world, including CES, has all major Chinese retailers participating together. CES Asia is becoming the place where you can see the future of retailing for and incredibly important marketplace.
  1. Executives come to CES Asia to see what’s next. While at CES Asia, I met with a number of major multinational executive teams. They came to Shanghai looking to understand where the world is going, especially as it relates to the Asian marketplace.

Check out my CES Asia Trends to Watch presentation to learn more.

Major product announcements at this year’s show included:

  • 360: 360 Intelligent Camera 1080P
  • BMW: iFuture concept car
  • Mercedes-Benz: F015 Luxury in Motion research vechicle
  • Garmin: Forerunner 735XT multisport watch (I personally can’t wait to buy this one!)
  • Intel: Collaborations with Razer’s Razer Blade gaming laptop, Tencent’s TGP box and Lenovo’s smart shoe, in partnership with Vibram.
  • JD.com: A new generation of Dingdong AIUI speech recognition along with the DingDong open platform.
  • Bubble Lab: robotic coffee barista (innovation like this will not only change forever how we work, but will forever change how we live)

ZOL presented the Best of CES Asia Awards which included the following:

  • Best VR Product: PIMAX 4K
  • Best Wearable: Intel/Lenovo F2 Exercise Shoe
  • Best Transportation Product: BMW iVision Future Interaction
  • Best Connected Home Product: DingDong Smart Speaker
  • Best Drone: Yuneec Typhoon
  • Best Digital Audio Product: Phillips Fidelio E6
  • Best Television Technology: Hisense LT100K7900A
  • Best Personal Computing Device: Huawei P9
  • Best Startup: Avaz Free Speech and totwoo
  • Best Innovation (Disruptive Tech): Shanghai Qingtech Eye Control
  • Best Offbeat Product: COWA Robot Suitcase (THIS WAS AWESOME!)
  • Best Maker-Friendly Technology: ITO Film
  • People’s Voice Award: Garmin Fenix3
  • Best of the Best Award: Intel Realsense (I love Realsense!)

Major partnerships and business deals were publically announced as well:

  • LeEco and Twitter joined forces to grow LeEco’s global influence through Twitter’s live communications platform.
  • Mercedes-Benz and Baidu deepened partnership to offer Chinese Mercedes-Benz customers even more individual services for their connected vehicles.
  • Intel collaborated with Razer’s Razer Blade gaming laptop, Tencent’s TGP box and Lenovo’s smart shoe, in partnership with Vibram
  • Alibaba Group gave the audience a sneak peek into the future of online shopping with the use of 3D technology.
  • com discussed how smart technology is driving innovation in the logistics and retail sector.

Want more? Watch the highlight videos from CES Asia.

 

 

 

If you you haven’t been following, well, trending new topics lately than you’ve probably missed the recent hoopla surrounding Facebook’s Trending Topics.

Here’s a quick recap: earlier this month Gizmodo reported on life inside Facebook’s Trending Topics followed by a subsequent report claiming Facebook contract employees routinely suppressed news stories of interest to conservative readers. Mark Zuckerberg replied directly to the allegations and  Facebook published their 28-page internal Trending Review Guidelines document to provide additional transparency.

Justin Osofsky, Facebook’s VP Global Operations, outlined how Trending Topics works in a post on the same day. Here’s the gist: topics are first “surfaced by algorithm.” I love this eloquent vignette and I’ll discuss the importance of this in more detail shortly. The “surfaced” topics are then reviewed by the Facebook Trending Topics team who then provide several layers of curation and customization. Finally, algorithms are again employed to determine who receives which Trending Topics suggestions.     

 

The revelation that Facebook currently relies more on humans and less on algorithms than presupposed has been jarring for some. Perhaps at the heart of this issue is perceived transparency. I think it’s more accurately, the perception that an implicit contract was broken.We make different implicit contracts with businesses, service providers and platforms and when those implicit contracts are broken, users become unsettled. I think one of the implicit contracts users have with Facebook is the unfiltered flowing of information.

What’s fascinated me through all of this dialogue is the dichotomy that exists. Many people are extremely alarmed by how much we are turning over to machines but when it is revealed that humans are significantly more involved at different layers of something like news curation than we previously realized, we become equally berate. I think above all else, this is the issue that is going to stay with us in the years to come. What’s the right blend between humans and algorithms? Where do we want humans more involved and where do we want algorithms and machines more involved. To get the mix right will involve experimentation.

Over time, human involvement will be driven by two factors. First, we’ll employ human capital where it still has a comparative advantage. Economists differentiate between absolute advantage and comparative advantage. There will be times when machines will have an absolute advantage, but humans might still have a comparative advantage. Secondly, employing human capital will also be a decision we make explicitly. I envision a myriad of places we’ll want to use humans over algorithms for any number of reasons. Our tastes and preferences evolve continuously and in non-predictive ways for example. Even as algorithms can decipher some of these trends, we may want humans involved. I think humans will continue to play key roles in settings with customer service elements. I also think customer service will evolve as we deploy more machines (a topic for a future post). Despite how little we sometimes trust other humans, we seem to trust machines and algorithms even less. Developing greater trust will be a key component in the further deployment of algorithms and machines.

I think Facebook’s process, as outlined by Osofsky in his post, is probably a realistic guide for our future. Algorithms will be used in tandem with humans. We’ll pass work product between humans and machines, each adding additional value along the way. Work flow will involve humans and machines at different points in the process. Work might begin when something is “surfaced by algorithm.” From there it might be passed along a designed work flow until a human intervenes and adds additional value, at which point it cycles back through machines. Over time, the jobs performed by both the human and the machine will likely change, but throughout, I think both will provide important value to work products.     

Steven Sinofsky recently wrote about technologies labeled as toys and recounts a list of innovations over his career labeled as such. He posits that “it can be said that being labeled a toy is necessary, but not sufficient, to become the next big thing.”

His article begs the question, what innovations are being labeled toys today? Here are 10 innovations I see currently being labeled a toy:

  1. Virtual Reality
  2. Augmented Reality
  3. Drones
  4. Autonomous Vehicles
  5. Wearables
  6. SmartHome
  7. SmartWatches
  8. Home Robots
  9. IoT generally (especially outside of Industrial applications)
  10. AI (still!)

What else would you add?

 

Two weeks ago, I took my oldest son Nick (12 years old in the 7th grade) to the Wizard’s game. We grabbed dinner at District Taco before walking over to the Verizon Center. At the time we were in the midst of Mobile World Congress. Two days earlier (February 21st),  Samsung had released a dongle that would give your car an LTE connection and the Samsung’s Galaxy S7 (among other things). I mentioned the dongle to my son. Reflecting on our long road trip last summer, I thought an Internet hotspot for the car would be something he would find appealing. He replied with, “and they also released the Galaxy S7.” He didn’t know that it happened at MWC, but just that it happened earlier in the week. I preceded to ask him how he heard the news. He said he saw it in ads on Snapchat and Instagram and said there were also trending hashtags on Instagram.

The dichotomy between Twitter and other platforms is a real one. Fred Wilson blogged a few days ago about what he referred to as the “Twitter Contradiction.” While many of us kept abreast of MWC news on Twitter, the cohorts following us are leaning (and learning) on other platforms. That doesn’t mean they will always use these other platforms. Or that they will also use them in the ways in which they use them now. It also doesn’t mean that they won’t “grow into” Twitter. But they don’t appear to be “turning” to Twitter when news breaks like older cohorts currently seem to doinh – whether it be geopolitical events or basketball games.

Platforms face three great challenges – (1) staying relevant to current users, (2) being relevant to future users (especially younger cohorts), and (3) maintaining some lock-in over other platforms. The third point is related to switching costs – what burden is borne by users should they decide to switch to a different platform? Staying power – especially on the Internet – is extremely difficult. When audiences start to move, they tend to not come back.

A week later I was at an Oscar’s party where I watched as an 11 year-old girl (6th grade) saw the Samsung Galaxy S7 commercial. She doesn’t have a cellphone of her own and seeing the commercial during the Oscar’s marked her first exposure to the new model of Samsung’s flagship phone. I watched as she used the marketing copy of the commercial to try to convince her mom to get it for her: “Expandable memory….” “faster wireless charging…” The more she read aloud the marketing copy, the more she wanted the Galaxy S7.

Both her mom and her dad have iPhones, but she wants the Samsung phone. When I inquired why she wanted the Galaxy S7 instead of an iPhone she didn’t have a list of reasons, or even a single reason. She just wants the Samsung phone. Obviously this is just a single observation, but it’s an interesting one.

At the Wizard’s game, Nick and I also talked about generational definitions. It seems like everything I read these days is cast within generational definitions, but it wasn’t something he was familiar with. He asked what his generation was named. While there’s not officially agreed upon definition for his cohort (yet), I gave him some of the ones being used. I included “Homeland Generation.” The homeland generation is so named because these are the kids born after 9/11. While I don’t like it, the world is a very different place since 9/11. He asked me if we had to go through metal detectors at the airport before 9/11 and I couldn’t even remember. The world we live in as in many ways become the only world we can remember.

52 minutes

 

Some of my favorite quotes:

“It is better to know how to learn than to know.”

“Life’s too short to wake up with regrets. So love the people who treat you right, forgive the ones who don’t and believe that everything happens for a reason. If you get a chance, take it. If it changes your life, let it. Nobody said it’d be easy, they just promised it would be worth it.”

“To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world.”

“Today you are You, that is truer than true. There is no one alive who is Youer than You.”

“Don’t cry because it’s over, smile because it happened.”

“Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple.”

“I have heard there are troubles of more than one kind. Some come from ahead and some come from behind. But I’ve bought a big bat. I’m all ready you see. Now my troubles are going to have troubles with me!”

“Adults are just obsolete children and the hell with them.”

“If you never did you should. These things are fun and fun is good.”

“It’s not about what it is, it’s about what it can become.”

and his take on love:

“We are all a little weird and life is a little weird, and when we find someone whose weirdness is compatible with ours, we join up with them and fall in mutual weirdness and call it love.”

 

 

7 minutes

Earlier this year, I wrote how I wanted to post more frequently. I set out to post daily. Two months in and I’ve got a few posts to show for myself. It isn’t for lack of material. There is SO much to write about. Each and every day I cross dozens of topics worthy of exploration. I tweet out many of these ideas. (ASIDE: twitter is currently my go-to for sharing thoughts and interesting articles I’m reading. Given all of the controversy around the viability of Twitter, perhaps I should write a blog post about it….).

I set-out frequently to blog about the ideas I have. To expand far beyond 140 characters. To build a thesis. To explore a topic in some depth. But I just haven’t set into any kind of rhythm. So unfinished drafts remain unfinished. I have dozens of drafts currently open on my laptop, awaiting more attention from me. But that attention never seems to come.

Then today I read John Biggs post, “What happens when you write 11,000 blog posts?” Can we just pause for a moment and take that in….eeeelllleven thoooouuusand! At my current pace, I’ll hit 11,000 posts in….oh….183 years! (yes, I did the math). A few thing struck me. First, John says he can bang out a blog post in five minutes. Secondly, he notes that blogging hampered his long-form writing:

I’ve been sprinting so long that writing anything longer than 1,000 words is an odd feeling. To be a true long-form writer you have to produce, edit, and revise for hours. I learned that blogging ruins long-form when I wrote my books, most notably Marie Antoinette’s Watch. I could not hold a thread and my writing, while dense, was imperfect. I didn’t have the discipline necessary to write long. Here’s hoping I can get it back. Treasure it if you have it, even if it won’t make you any money.

I realized while I was targeting word count, I should have been targeting time. Targeting time will make me quicker and it will also enable me to schedule around it which will help me find a very needed rhythm. I also realized that one of the things holding me back was my long-form writing. I have been immersed in long-form writing over the last few years. I’ve been DROWNING in long-form. Yes, I published some 20 op-eds and editorials last year which are shorter form, but my focus over the last few years has been long-form. I finally got around to finishing my dissertation and I also finished my first book Digital Destiny. I like the nature of long-form. You have room to build out a robust thesis. You have room to explore adjacent topics. I’ve no desire to forsake long-form for 11,000 blog posts, but I’m tired of ideas dying in drafts left open on my laptop. I’m abandoning word count. I’m going to target time. I’ll start with 15 minutes and I’ll allow myself some extra time as needed to finish my thought. I’ll report total time for each post.

Total time: 15 min + 13:54  = 28:54